This is a Reprint from diogod

Please become a member to support creators today

Remove ads

Feedback

Are you tired of SD giving you this completely prude tight fit high-cut armholes tank tops? Do you want your generated dork himbos and bimbos showing off their muscles at the gym?

Let’s fix it!

Lora weight works from 0.3 up to 1.0.

Start with 0.68

There is no trigger word. But you should reference a tank top, sleeveless shirt, gym stringer or singlet. If for males you are getting too much belly crop top shirts or shirtless it helps to use “Shirt:1.2” and just “tank” without the word “top”.

Supporting prompts:

shirt, tank top, tank, sleeveless shirt, (high crewneck:1.3), low-cut chest (males), low-cut cleavage (female), extreme low-cut dropped side holes, side boobs (female), side pecs (males), (male/female) nipple slip, side view, profile, front view, full body medium shot, long shirt, loose shirt, muscle body, thin body

Negative supporting prompts:

skin holes, shirtless, jewelry, necklace, muscular, head out of frame

SD does not know what a shirt “neckline” is either. So, there is also no point in using that word. To get a high-cut neckline, the best combination of words in my testing was simple “high crewneck” with 1.3 weight. The normal SD will understand that one without the lora. But with the lora it’s way easier. You might get the effect of those manual ripped cropped shirts that get cut to be a tank top. You might also get a sleeveless turtleneck shirt.

In regards to the concept of large armholes itself, this lora is kind of cheating. It is a specific type of clothing lora, not a concept. Maybe 2 clothes (low-cut cleavage tank tops and high-cut neckline tank shirts). It’s not a lora on the concept of “armholes”.

I got quite curious about how to train a concept, not a clothe like this one. I might try another lora that have a different dataset on the concept of “armhole”, so maybe we can adjust any type of clothes armhole sizes with that other lora. But maybe. It will probably be hard to train this kind of abstract specific concept.

Problems with the current Lora:

- Using “extreme low-cut dropped side holes” will give holes to other things. Use “skin holes” on negative

- Bias to muscular body type. Just prompt it away

- Nipples showing weirdly below the shirt. I always see this with SD, don’t think it’s exclusively a problem with this lora

Some settings: Trained 768 res. More than 205 pictures. 2 steps each image. 3 different folders/concepts (2_stringer shirt / 2_low-cut chest stringer shirt / 2_low-cut cleavage stringer shirt). AdamW.